Jump to content




Photo

Am I on the right track?


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Kristi Bothur

Kristi Bothur

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 10 February 2013 - 12:15 AM

Dianna (and anyone else),

 

I have drafted a letter to send to my representative and any others that I need to.  Since I am still learning a great deal about the state of home schooling in South Carolina, I want to make sure I am on the right track, particularly with my arguments against creating a registry of names/addresses of home schooling children.  I am pasting it below and if anyone has the time and inclination to read it, I would appreciate some constructive criticism so I represent our position well.  (We have not begun home schooling yet, but we will start with our daughter in kindergarten in the fall, and all of our nieces and nephews home school, although in other states, so we have long been "on board" with this approach to education.)

 

 

Dear Ms. ____,



I have recently been made aware of House Bill H3478, currently before the K-12 Education Subcommittee.  My husband and I will begin homeschooling my kindergarten daughter in the fall of 2013, and I would like to briefly share why I am so firmly opposed to every facet of this bill.


As I understand it, this bill would change three important things for home educated students in South Carolina:

(1)   Require participation in state standardized testing;

According to the South Carolina Department of Education website, the purpose of both PASS and  HSAP is to meet school, district, state, and federal accountability requirements. They are designed to measure student performance on the SC Academic Standards.  It is patently unfair and unnecessary to require home schooled students to participate in these because (a) my home school does not receive state or federal funds and therefore is not required to meet the accountability requirements that the public schools are subject to; and ( B) I will be teaching “basic instructional areas of reading, writing, mathematics, science, and social studies” as required Section 59-65-40 of South Carolina law, but I am not bound to the SC Academic Standards and may vary from them quite a bit, depending on the educational needs of my children.  The SC standardized testing instruments are not a valid measurement tool for home schools that teach children on a different schedule than that of the public schools or who cover different topics.

(2)  Require homeschooling accountability organizations to report student names to the South Carolina State Department of Education

This is a gross violation of my privacy and that of other home schooling families.  Private and parochial schools are not required to  submit the names of their students to the state and neither should home schooling associations.  My understanding is that some lawmakers believe that creating a state registry of home school students will help identify possible victims of child abuse.  While I understand that many cases of child abuse are discovered and reported by school officials, the reason for this is because they are in regular contact with that child.  There is no way that having a state registry of home school students will help identify abused children unless someone is going to each home and interviewing children on a regular basis – which would be completely unconstitutional.

(3)  Eliminate “Option 3” by July 2014

As I am sure you are aware, “Option 3” allows parents to legally educate their children at home by joining an accountability group to whom they report attendance and individualized documentation of their students’ progress.  These associations are less expensive than the annual fees for SCAIHS (Option 2) and offer more flexibility in terms of curriculum than either of the other two options.  For sixteen years, “Option 3” has been working.  Eliminating it would place a financial burden on parents, it would create a monopoly in SCAIHS

(the leaders of which also opposes this bill) , would flood both SCHAIS (Option 2) and the public school system (Option 1) with an influx of students that they are not likely prepared to absorb, and would shuttle families into a “one-size-fits-all” approach to curriculum instead of the ability to provide individualized instruction according to their children’s strengths and weaknesses.


My father used to tell us when we were growing up, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” 

South Carolina’s home school system is working, and learning about our fair laws made me and my husband excited to begin this journey.  Please stand in opposition to H3478, a bill that fixes nothing and can only add hardship to conscientious families who are educating their children at home.

Sincerely,

Kristi Bothur, M.Ed. Curriculum and Instruction
Columbia, SC

 

 

Thank you for any input!  

 

P.S.  Ignore the smiley face in it - i was trying to enumerate my response with a) and b and it turned it into a smiley.


Edited by Kristi Bothur, 10 February 2013 - 12:16 AM.


#2 Dianna

Dianna

    Chocoholic

  • Administrators
  • 1,418 posts
  • LocationSouth Carolina

Posted 10 February 2013 - 01:07 AM

Kristi, I think this is spot on, and I think including your credentials with your name will not allow them to dismiss you so easily. They shouldn't dismiss anyone's letters, but I bet they'll try to explain a lot of them away with "they don't know what they're talking about... we know what's best for them."

 

The only grammatical error I saw was in this sentence: (the leaders of which also opposes this bill), it should be (the leaders of which also oppose this bill).

 

Also, if you're planning on using the third option, it would be Section 59-65-47, instead of Section 59-65-40 (which is Option 1).

 

It's late, so I may have missed something, but I think your letter is wonderful. It's concise and easy to read, yet hits all the points without being rude or inflammatory. Kudos to you!

 

Warmly,

Dianna